DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

Test + ODI + T20I verdict list

Greatest Test, ODI & T20I Bowlers of All Time

Jasprit Bumrah rises above Dale Steyn by a breath. Dale Steyn keeps the better volume in Test bowling, 439 wickets to 234 wickets. Jasprit Bumrah's volume in T20I bowling settles it, 118 wickets to 64 wickets.

Combined82.5
Test
86.7
ODI
78.7
T20I
82.1
#2

South Africa

Combined80.8
Test
89.5
ODI
75.8
T20I
77.2
#3

Pakistan

Combined77.3
Test
67.4
ODI
85.7
T20I
78.9
Combined76.6
Test
68.7
ODI
72.7
T20I
88.5
#5
Combined72.6
Test
82.0
ODI
71.6
T20I
64.3
#6

New Zealand

Combined71.7
Test
76.3
ODI
78.4
T20I
60.5
#7
Combined68.4
Test
39.2
ODI
80.5
T20I
85.6
#8
Combined68.1
Test
82.7
ODI
78.4
T20I
43.2
#9

Bangladesh

Combined67.8
Test
63.7
ODI
66.1
T20I
73.7
#10
Combined67.4
Test
63.4
ODI
64.6
T20I
74.3
Where the verdict was won: Test
Jasprit Bumrah
86.7 — led by Bowling average (27.4 of it), then Volume (19.6)
Dale Steyn
89.5 — led by Bowling average (25.5 of it), then Volume (22.9)
Saeed Ajmal
67.4 — led by Bowling average (20.6 of it), then Volume (18.1)
Kuldeep Yadav
68.7 — led by Bowling average (25.2 of it), then Volume (9.9)
Josh Hazlewood
82.0 — led by Bowling average (24.7 of it), then Volume (20.9)
Trent Boult
76.3 — led by Volume (21.4 of it), then Bowling average (21.3)
Ajantha Mendis
39.2 — led by Bowling average (10.4 of it), then Volume (8.5)
Mitchell Starc
82.7 — led by Volume (23.0 of it), then Bowling average (22.8)
Shakib Al Hasan
63.7 — led by Volume (20.0 of it), then Bowling average (14.6)
Graeme Swann
63.4 — led by Volume (20.3 of it), then Bowling average (17.3)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.
Where the verdict was won: ODI
Jasprit Bumrah
78.7 — led by Bowling average (17.9 of it), then Volume (11.0)
Dale Steyn
75.8 — led by Bowling average (16.2 of it), then Volume (12.1)
Saeed Ajmal
85.7 — led by Bowling average (18.4 of it), then Economy (14.1)
Kuldeep Yadav
72.7 — led by Bowling average (15.6 of it), then Volume (12.2)
Josh Hazlewood
71.6 — led by Bowling average (15.0 of it), then Volume (10.7)
Trent Boult
78.4 — led by Bowling average (17.4 of it), then Volume (12.6)
Ajantha Mendis
80.5 — led by Bowling average (18.6 of it), then Bowling average vs strong opposition (11.4)
Mitchell Starc
78.4 — led by Bowling average (18.1 of it), then Volume (13.1)
Shakib Al Hasan
66.1 — led by Volume (13.8 of it), then Bowling average (12.7)
Graeme Swann
64.6 — led by Bowling average (14.8 of it), then Economy (10.6)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.
Where the verdict was won: T20I
Jasprit Bumrah
82.1 — led by Economy (25.5 of it), then Bowling average (12.9)
Dale Steyn
77.2 — led by Economy (22.6 of it), then Bowling average (13.0)
Saeed Ajmal
78.9 — led by Economy (26.6 of it), then Bowling average (13.5)
Kuldeep Yadav
88.5 — led by Economy (23.2 of it), then Bowling average (15.0)
Josh Hazlewood
64.3 — led by Economy (15.6 of it), then Bowling average (11.2)
Trent Boult
60.5 — led by Economy (12.2 of it), then Bowling average vs strong opposition (9.7)
Ajantha Mendis
85.6 — led by Economy (26.0 of it), then Bowling average (14.7)
Mitchell Starc
43.2 — led by Economy (11.9 of it), then Bowling average vs strong opposition (6.5)
Shakib Al Hasan
73.7 — led by Economy (23.8 of it), then Bowling average (11.1)
Graeme Swann
74.3 — led by Economy (26.3 of it), then Bowling average (14.2)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Bowling factors and weights

Compared with 504 bowlers who played at least 20 innings and bowled at least 3,000 balls.

Bowling factors and weights

Compared with 441 bowlers who played at least 20 innings and bowled at least 1,500 balls.

Bowling factors and weights

Compared with 100 bowlers who took at least 50 wickets.

Important scoring choices

Longevity: uses the square root of career span in years multiplied by matches selected. Match counts and first/last dates come from playing-XI appearances, so a did-not-bat or did-not-bowl match still counts.

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Test average magnitude: overall averages use 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the best qualified average. For bowlers the ratio is reversed because a lower average is better. Contextual averages remain pure percentiles.

Wicket magnitude: career and long-era wicket volume uses 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the leading qualified wicket total. This preserves the difference between exceptional totals that sit together at the top of a percentile table. Run volume stays a pure percentile, because career run totals vary far more widely and blending raw magnitude there would penalise a short career of outstanding quality.

ODI eligibility: this curated list includes players representing current ICC full-member teams. All of their recorded opposition still counts.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
Test + ODI + T20IGreatest Test, ODI & T20I Bowlers of All TimeTop 10