Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Test + ODI verdict list
Viv Richards rises above Jacques Kallis by a breath. Jacques Kallis keeps the better volume in Test bowling, 291 wickets to 32 wickets. Viv Richards's strike rate in ODI batting settles it, 90.20 (1.36× his era) to 73.13 (0.97× his era).
Transparent by design
The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.
Compared with 1,227 batters who played at least 20 innings.
Compared with 505 bowlers who played at least 20 innings and bowled at least 3,000 balls.
Compared with 878 batters who played at least 20 innings.
Compared with 447 bowlers who played at least 20 innings and bowled at least 1,500 balls.
Longevity: uses the square root of career span in years multiplied by matches selected. Match counts and first/last dates come from playing-XI appearances, so a did-not-bat or did-not-bowl match still counts.
Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.
Test average magnitude: overall averages use 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the best qualified average. For bowlers the ratio is reversed because a lower average is better. Contextual averages remain pure percentiles.
Wicket magnitude: career and long-era wicket volume uses 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the leading qualified wicket total. This preserves the difference between exceptional totals that sit together at the top of a percentile table. Run volume stays a pure percentile, because career run totals vary far more widely and blending raw magnitude there would penalise a short career of outstanding quality.
Greatest-player mix: within each format, the stronger qualified batting or bowling verdict contributes 90%. A secondary discipline contributes 10% only when the player clears its qualification bar. Test, ODI and T20I then contribute equally when they are included.
ODI eligibility: this curated list includes players representing current ICC full-member teams. All of their recorded opposition still counts.
Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players.
Across eras: each rate factor — average, strike rate, economy and the rest — is expressed as an index against the decade it was played in, then ranked against peers. A player is therefore measured against the cricket around him, not against a flat century-wide baseline. Runs and wickets are counts and stay unadjusted.