IPL verdict list
Greatest IPL All-rounders of All Time
Andre Russell rises above Sunil Narine by a breath. Sunil Narine keeps the better economy in IPL bowling, 6.79 to 9.51. Andre Russell's bowling strike rate in IPL bowling settles it, 14.68 to 22.47.
Kolkata Knight Riders · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 65.5
- IPL Bowling
- 56.7
Kolkata Knight Riders · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 46.4
- IPL Bowling
- 75.9
Chennai Super Kings · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 65.4
- IPL Bowling
- 47.6
Rajasthan Royals · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 40.9
- IPL Bowling
- 50.6
Chennai Super Kings · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 24.9
- IPL Bowling
- 68.5
Delhi Capitals · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 32.4
- IPL Bowling
- 47.0
Mumbai Indians · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 61.8
- IPL Bowling
- 24.1
Royal Challengers Bengaluru · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 32.4
- IPL Bowling
- 42.6
Mumbai Indians · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 54.9
- IPL Bowling
- 16.7
Kolkata Knight Riders · latest recorded team
- IPL Batting
- 27.4
- IPL Bowling
- 24.8
- Andre Russell
- 65.5 — led by Strike rate (35.0 of it), then Longevity (6.9)
- Sunil Narine
- 46.4 — led by Strike rate (33.8 of it), then Longevity (9.0)
- Shane Watson
- 65.4 — led by Strike rate (21.3 of it), then Average in wins (11.4)
- Ravindra Jadeja
- 40.9 — led by Strike rate (12.9 of it), then Longevity (9.8)
- Dwayne Bravo
- 24.9 — led by Strike rate (11.3 of it), then Longevity (7.9)
- Axar Patel
- 32.4 — led by Strike rate (15.7 of it), then Longevity (7.7)
- Kieron Pollard
- 61.8 — led by Strike rate (28.2 of it), then Average in wins (9.0)
- Krunal Pandya
- 32.4 — led by Strike rate (16.1 of it), then Longevity (6.4)
- Hardik Pandya
- 54.9 — led by Strike rate (27.4 of it), then Longevity (6.8)
- Jacques Kallis
- 27.4 — led by Average (7.4 of it), then Consistency (6.6)
- Andre Russell
- 56.7 — led by Bowling average (18.8 of it), then Bowling strike rate (12.0)
- Sunil Narine
- 75.9 — led by Economy (31.5 of it), then Bowling average (15.9)
- Shane Watson
- 47.6 — led by Economy (18.5 of it), then Bowling average (7.8)
- Ravindra Jadeja
- 50.6 — led by Economy (23.0 of it), then Longevity (10.0)
- Dwayne Bravo
- 68.5 — led by Bowling average (17.5 of it), then Bowling strike rate (11.3)
- Axar Patel
- 47.0 — led by Economy (26.5 of it), then Longevity (8.6)
- Kieron Pollard
- 24.1 — led by Longevity (8.9 of it), then Economy (6.5)
- Krunal Pandya
- 42.6 — led by Economy (25.0 of it), then Longevity (6.7)
- Hardik Pandya
- 16.7 — led by Longevity (7.2 of it), then Bowling strike rate (4.1)
- Jacques Kallis
- 24.8 — led by Economy (19.5 of it), then Longevity (1.6)
Transparent by design
How this ranking was calculated
The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.
- Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
- Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
- Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
- Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
- Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Compared with 88 batters who played at least 60 innings and scored at least 1,000 runs.
Compared with 65 bowlers who played at least 60 innings, bowled at least 600 balls and took at least 50 wickets.
Longevity: uses the square root of career span in years multiplied by matches selected. Match counts and first/last dates come from playing-XI appearances, so a did-not-bat or did-not-bowl match still counts.
Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.
All-rounders: a player must clear both qualification bars. The batting and bowling verdicts are combined with a geometric mean, preventing one outstanding discipline from completely carrying a weak one.
Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.