Test verdict list
Best Test Bowlers of the 2010s
Dale Steyn rises above James Anderson, and the edge holds. James Anderson keeps the better volume in Test bowling, 429 wickets to 267 wickets. Dale Steyn's bowling strike rate in Test bowling settles it, 43.93 to 54.94.
South Africa
- Bowling average
- 22.30
- Bowling strike rate
- 43.93
- Away bowling average
- 24.14
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 23.31
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 47.22
- Bowling average in wins
- 16.56
- Volume
- 267 wickets
England
- Bowling average
- 24.35
- Bowling strike rate
- 54.94
- Away bowling average
- 30.78
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 27.20
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 34.50
- Bowling average in wins
- 18.24
- Volume
- 429 wickets
South Africa
- Bowling average
- 21.99
- Bowling strike rate
- 49.94
- Away bowling average
- 28.82
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 24.79
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 32.46
- Bowling average in wins
- 17.50
- Volume
- 220 wickets
India
- Bowling average
- 25.37
- Bowling strike rate
- 53.62
- Away bowling average
- 31.40
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 28.30
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 49.62
- Bowling average in wins
- 20.08
- Volume
- 362 wickets
South Africa
- Bowling average
- 22.57
- Bowling strike rate
- 40.02
- Away bowling average
- 30.16
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 25.12
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 52.00
- Bowling average in wins
- 17.52
- Volume
- 190 wickets
Australia
- Bowling average
- 21.93
- Bowling strike rate
- 47.22
- Away bowling average
- 21.86
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 22.59
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 52.73
- Bowling average in wins
- 20.21
- Volume
- 139 wickets
South Africa
- Bowling average
- 25.99
- Bowling strike rate
- 52.33
- Away bowling average
- 26.26
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 26.93
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 36.00
- Bowling average in wins
- 21.93
- Volume
- 248 wickets
Sri Lanka
- Bowling average
- 26.42
- Bowling strike rate
- 57.52
- Away bowling average
- 36.46
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 29.24
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 50.38
- Bowling average in wins
- 17.30
- Volume
- 363 wickets
New Zealand
- Bowling average
- 26.52
- Bowling strike rate
- 51.65
- Away bowling average
- 26.13
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 27.25
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 44.19
- Bowling average in wins
- 20.81
- Volume
- 201 wickets
India
- Bowling average
- 24.64
- Bowling strike rate
- 60.77
- Away bowling average
- 35.06
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 24.66
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 42.39
- Bowling average in wins
- 21.17
- Volume
- 211 wickets
- Dale Steyn
- 94.0 — led by Volume (31.9 of it), then Bowling average (28.6)
- James Anderson
- 90.6 — led by Volume (35.0 of it), then Bowling average (27.5)
- Vernon Philander
- 89.2 — led by Volume (30.0 of it), then Bowling average (28.9)
- Ravichandran Ashwin
- 88.8 — led by Volume (33.3 of it), then Bowling average (27.0)
- Kagiso Rabada
- 88.8 — led by Bowling average (28.4 of it), then Volume (28.3)
- Pat Cummins
- 87.2 — led by Bowling average (29.1 of it), then Volume (25.1)
- Morne Morkel
- 86.4 — led by Volume (31.0 of it), then Bowling average (26.4)
- Rangana Herath
- 85.4 — led by Volume (33.5 of it), then Bowling average (25.4)
- Neil Wagner
- 84.1 — led by Volume (29.1 of it), then Bowling average (25.0)
- Ravindra Jadeja
- 83.3 — led by Volume (29.7 of it), then Bowling average (27.3)
Transparent by design
How this ranking was calculated
The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.
- Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
- Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
- Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
- Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
- Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Compared with 135 bowlers who played at least 10 innings and bowled at least 1,500 balls.
Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.
Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.
Test average magnitude: overall averages use 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the best qualified average. For bowlers the ratio is reversed because a lower average is better. Contextual averages remain pure percentiles.
Wicket magnitude: career and long-era wicket volume uses 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the leading qualified wicket total. This preserves the difference between exceptional totals that sit together at the top of a percentile table. Run volume stays a pure percentile, because career run totals vary far more widely and blending raw magnitude there would penalise a short career of outstanding quality.
Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.