DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

Test verdict list

Best Test Bowlers of the 2000s

Muthiah Muralidaran rises above Glenn McGrath, and the edge holds. Glenn McGrath keeps the better away bowling average in Test bowling, 19.97 to 26.36. Muthiah Muralidaran's volume in Test bowling settles it, 565 wickets to 297 wickets.

Verdict96.6
Bowling average
20.97
Bowling strike rate
50.95
Away bowling average
26.36
Bowling average vs strong opposition
25.23
Wicket-taking consistency
74.68
Bowling average in wins
15.50
Volume
565 wickets
#2

Australia

Verdict92.9
Bowling average
20.54
Bowling strike rate
51.49
Away bowling average
19.97
Bowling average vs strong opposition
22.89
Wicket-taking consistency
41.22
Bowling average in wins
18.07
Volume
297 wickets
#3

Australia

Verdict89.8
Bowling average
25.17
Bowling strike rate
50.78
Away bowling average
24.01
Bowling average vs strong opposition
26.57
Wicket-taking consistency
56.69
Bowling average in wins
23.37
Volume
357 wickets
#4
Verdict88.2
Bowling average
22.22
Bowling strike rate
39.68
Away bowling average
21.82
Bowling average vs strong opposition
26.88
Wicket-taking consistency
47.37
Bowling average in wins
17.18
Volume
144 wickets
#5

South Africa

Verdict87.5
Bowling average
23.97
Bowling strike rate
40.00
Away bowling average
24.36
Bowling average vs strong opposition
30.30
Wicket-taking consistency
53.97
Bowling average in wins
16.68
Volume
172 wickets
#6

South Africa

Verdict84.7
Bowling average
24.77
Bowling strike rate
61.09
Away bowling average
28.36
Bowling average vs strong opposition
26.51
Wicket-taking consistency
29.63
Bowling average in wins
20.22
Volume
260 wickets
#7

South Africa

Verdict83.6
Bowling average
28.64
Bowling strike rate
52.85
Away bowling average
37.38
Bowling average vs strong opposition
32.13
Wicket-taking consistency
36.81
Bowling average in wins
21.95
Volume
380 wickets
#8

West Indies

Verdict83.4
Bowling average
19.73
Bowling strike rate
57.24
Away bowling average
20.38
Bowling average vs strong opposition
27.03
Wicket-taking consistency
44.44
Bowling average in wins
14.03
Volume
93 wickets
#9

New Zealand

Verdict83.0
Bowling average
22.09
Bowling strike rate
38.76
Away bowling average
25.05
Bowling average vs strong opposition
30.57
Wicket-taking consistency
50.00
Bowling average in wins
14.82
Volume
87 wickets
#10
Verdict81.1
Bowling average
27.09
Bowling strike rate
57.45
Away bowling average
28.90
Bowling average vs strong opposition
31.33
Wicket-taking consistency
31.86
Bowling average in wins
22.28
Volume
209 wickets
Where the verdict was won
Muthiah Muralidaran
96.6 — led by Volume (35.0 of it), then Bowling average (28.8)
Glenn McGrath
92.9 — led by Volume (31.3 of it), then Bowling average (29.0)
Shane Warne
89.8 — led by Volume (32.7 of it), then Bowling average (26.2)
Shoaib Akhtar
88.2 — led by Bowling average (28.2 of it), then Volume (26.9)
Dale Steyn
87.5 — led by Volume (27.7 of it), then Bowling average (26.9)
Shaun Pollock
84.7 — led by Volume (30.8 of it), then Bowling average (26.6)
Makhaya Ntini
83.6 — led by Volume (33.1 of it), then Bowling average (24.1)
Courtney Walsh
83.4 — led by Bowling average (29.4 of it), then Volume (22.8)
Shane Bond
83.0 — led by Bowling average (28.4 of it), then Volume (21.7)
Jason Gillespie
81.1 — led by Volume (28.7 of it), then Bowling average (25.7)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Bowling factors and weights

Compared with 149 bowlers who played at least 10 innings and bowled at least 1,500 balls.

Important scoring choices

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.

Test average magnitude: overall averages use 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the best qualified average. For bowlers the ratio is reversed because a lower average is better. Contextual averages remain pure percentiles.

Wicket magnitude: career and long-era wicket volume uses 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the leading qualified wicket total. This preserves the difference between exceptional totals that sit together at the top of a percentile table. Run volume stays a pure percentile, because career run totals vary far more widely and blending raw magnitude there would penalise a short career of outstanding quality.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
TestBest Test Bowlers of the 2000sTop 10