DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

Test verdict list

Best Test Batters of the 21st Century

Jacques Kallis rises above Kumar Sangakkara by a breath. Kumar Sangakkara keeps the better average in wins in Test batting, 71.70 to 67.44. Jacques Kallis's average vs strong opposition in Test batting settles it, 50.78 to 47.71.

#1

South Africa

Verdict98.8
Average
58.67
Away average
55.07
Average vs strong opposition
50.78
Consistency
38.43
Average in wins
67.44
Volume
11,440 runs
#2
Verdict98.5
Average
57.41
Away average
53.13
Average vs strong opposition
47.71
Consistency
38.63
Average in wins
71.70
Volume
12,400 runs
#3

Australia

Verdict98.3
Average
56.00
Away average
54.83
Average vs strong opposition
55.36
Consistency
36.77
Average in wins
63.84
Volume
10,920 runs
Verdict97.6
Average
54.73
Away average
50.90
Average vs strong opposition
54.75
Consistency
34.86
Average in wins
71.34
Volume
9,633 runs
#5

Australia

Verdict97.1
Average
53.49
Away average
45.53
Average vs strong opposition
48.90
Consistency
37.02
Average in wins
62.60
Volume
11,286 runs
#6

England

Verdict96.8
Average
50.38
Away average
46.52
Average vs strong opposition
50.69
Consistency
35.50
Average in wins
61.70
Volume
14,208 runs
Verdict96.6
Average
52.23
Away average
54.89
Average vs strong opposition
45.02
Consistency
34.58
Average in wins
62.79
Volume
10,080 runs
#8

Pakistan

Verdict96.6
Average
52.06
Away average
48.77
Average vs strong opposition
52.07
Consistency
31.46
Average in wins
74.39
Volume
10,099 runs
Verdict96.5
Average
52.95
Away average
51.55
Average vs strong opposition
41.85
Consistency
33.77
Average in wins
70.68
Volume
10,590 runs
#10
Verdict96.3
Average
56.21
Away average
48.48
Average vs strong opposition
44.56
Consistency
36.43
Average in wins
65.79
Volume
6,633 runs
Where the verdict was won
Jacques Kallis
98.8 — led by Volume (34.9 of it), then Average (29.6)
Kumar Sangakkara
98.5 — led by Volume (34.9 of it), then Average (29.5)
Steven Smith
98.3 — led by Volume (34.8 of it), then Average (29.3)
Shivnarine Chanderpaul
97.6 — led by Volume (34.5 of it), then Average (29.1)
Ricky Ponting
97.1 — led by Volume (34.8 of it), then Average (28.8)
Joe Root
96.8 — led by Volume (35.0 of it), then Average (28.2)
Sachin Tendulkar
96.6 — led by Volume (34.6 of it), then Average (28.5)
Younis Khan
96.6 — led by Volume (34.6 of it), then Average (28.4)
Rahul Dravid
96.5 — led by Volume (34.7 of it), then Average (28.6)
Mohammad Yousuf
96.3 — led by Volume (33.5 of it), then Average (29.3)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Batting factors and weights

Compared with 748 batters who played at least 10 innings.

Important scoring choices

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.

Test average magnitude: overall averages use 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the best qualified average. For bowlers the ratio is reversed because a lower average is better. Contextual averages remain pure percentiles.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
TestBest Test Batters of the 21st CenturyTop 10