DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

Test verdict list

Best Test Batters of the 2000s

Ricky Ponting rises above Jacques Kallis by a breath. Jacques Kallis keeps the better away average in Test batting, 53.61 to 49.78. Ricky Ponting's average vs strong opposition in Test batting settles it, 51.47 to 45.77.

#1

Australia

Verdict98.0
Average
58.38
Away average
49.78
Average vs strong opposition
51.47
Consistency
39.13
Average in wins
65.72
Volume
9,458 runs
#2

South Africa

Verdict98.0
Average
58.71
Away average
53.61
Average vs strong opposition
45.77
Consistency
39.66
Average in wins
69.67
Volume
8,630 runs
#3
Verdict97.1
Average
58.54
Away average
51.37
Average vs strong opposition
46.85
Consistency
38.02
Average in wins
66.95
Volume
6,439 runs
#4
Verdict96.7
Average
55.10
Away average
50.24
Average vs strong opposition
48.34
Consistency
36.05
Average in wins
75.98
Volume
7,549 runs
Verdict96.5
Average
54.86
Away average
56.03
Average vs strong opposition
42.71
Consistency
35.75
Average in wins
74.71
Volume
8,558 runs
Verdict96.3
Average
55.32
Away average
44.28
Average vs strong opposition
61.90
Consistency
34.38
Average in wins
65.47
Volume
8,187 runs
#7

West Indies

Verdict95.8
Average
54.07
Away average
50.62
Average vs strong opposition
54.98
Consistency
33.33
Average in wins
68.00
Volume
6,380 runs
Verdict95.4
Average
53.20
Away average
54.07
Average vs strong opposition
43.73
Consistency
34.67
Average in wins
67.30
Volume
7,129 runs
#9
Verdict95.3
Average
55.58
Away average
48.56
Average vs strong opposition
48.95
Consistency
38.83
Average in wins
83.88
Volume
5,113 runs
Verdict95.1
Average
52.32
Away average
47.21
Average vs strong opposition
57.54
Consistency
36.49
Average in wins
57.32
Volume
6,435 runs
Where the verdict was won
Ricky Ponting
98.0 — led by Volume (35.0 of it), then Average (29.4)
Jacques Kallis
98.0 — led by Volume (34.9 of it), then Average (29.6)
Mohammad Yousuf
97.1 — led by Volume (34.2 of it), then Average (29.5)
Kumar Sangakkara
96.7 — led by Volume (34.5 of it), then Average (28.8)
Rahul Dravid
96.5 — led by Volume (34.8 of it), then Average (28.7)
Mahela Jayawardene
96.3 — led by Volume (34.6 of it), then Average (28.9)
Brian Lara
95.8 — led by Volume (34.0 of it), then Average (28.5)
Sachin Tendulkar
95.4 — led by Volume (34.4 of it), then Average (28.2)
Inzamam-ul-Haq
95.3 — led by Volume (32.8 of it), then Average (29.0)
Shivnarine Chanderpaul
95.1 — led by Volume (34.1 of it), then Average (28.0)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Batting factors and weights

Compared with 345 batters who played at least 10 innings.

Important scoring choices

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.

Test average magnitude: overall averages use 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the best qualified average. For bowlers the ratio is reversed because a lower average is better. Contextual averages remain pure percentiles.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
TestBest Test Batters of the 2000sTop 10