DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

Test verdict list

Best Test Batters of the 1970s

Sunil Gavaskar rises above Geoff Boycott by a breath. Geoff Boycott keeps the better average in wins in Test batting, 58.10 to 44.96. Sunil Gavaskar's volume in Test batting settles it, 5,647 runs to 3,806 runs.

Verdict97.5
Average
55.91
Away average
65.92
Average vs strong opposition
55.70
Consistency
43.52
Average in wins
44.96
Volume
5,647 runs
#2
Verdict96.4
Average
55.97
Away average
50.92
Average vs strong opposition
53.90
Consistency
42.86
Average in wins
58.10
Volume
3,806 runs
#3

Australia

Verdict96.2
Average
52.99
Away average
47.55
Average vs strong opposition
50.84
Consistency
37.50
Average in wins
66.52
Volume
4,398 runs
#4

West Indies

Verdict95.5
Average
58.21
Away average
62.03
Average vs strong opposition
70.59
Consistency
36.73
Average in wins
66.39
Volume
2,736 runs
#5
Verdict94.2
Average
49.45
Away average
51.02
Average vs strong opposition
43.46
Consistency
34.83
Average in wins
57.32
Volume
3,956 runs
#6

Australia

Verdict93.6
Average
50.19
Away average
53.85
Average vs strong opposition
46.98
Consistency
39.06
Average in wins
57.48
Volume
2,861 runs
#7

West Indies

Verdict93.0
Average
45.89
Away average
45.64
Average vs strong opposition
49.08
Consistency
33.33
Average in wins
61.35
Volume
3,809 runs
Verdict92.8
Average
46.11
Away average
41.21
Average vs strong opposition
46.27
Consistency
35.19
Average in wins
50.33
Volume
4,611 runs
#9

New Zealand

Verdict91.2
Average
49.38
Away average
46.76
Average vs strong opposition
55.07
Consistency
32.69
Average in wins
137.50
Volume
2,370 runs
#10

West Indies

Verdict91.1
Average
45.72
Away average
53.42
Average vs strong opposition
44.61
Consistency
30.86
Average in wins
64.35
Volume
3,475 runs
Where the verdict was won
Sunil Gavaskar
97.5 — led by Volume (35.0 of it), then Average (28.7)
Geoff Boycott
96.4 — led by Volume (34.0 of it), then Average (28.9)
Greg Chappell
96.2 — led by Volume (34.6 of it), then Average (28.2)
Viv Richards
95.5 — led by Volume (32.1 of it), then Average (29.2)
Alvin Kallicharran
94.2 — led by Volume (34.4 of it), then Average (27.4)
Ian Redpath
93.6 — led by Volume (32.5 of it), then Average (27.8)
Roy Fredericks
93.0 — led by Volume (34.2 of it), then Average (26.4)
Gundappa Viswanath
92.8 — led by Volume (34.8 of it), then Average (26.5)
Glenn Turner
91.2 — led by Volume (31.0 of it), then Average (27.3)
Clive Lloyd
91.1 — led by Volume (33.1 of it), then Average (26.1)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Batting factors and weights

Compared with 183 batters who played at least 10 innings.

Important scoring choices

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.

Test average magnitude: overall averages use 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the best qualified average. For bowlers the ratio is reversed because a lower average is better. Contextual averages remain pure percentiles.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
TestBest Test Batters of the 1970sTop 10