ODI verdict list
Best ODI Bowlers of the 2010s
Saeed Ajmal rises above Mitchell Starc, and the edge holds. Mitchell Starc keeps the better bowling strike rate in ODI bowling, 24.81 to 30.97. Saeed Ajmal's economy in ODI bowling settles it, 4.24 to 5.01.
Pakistan
- Bowling average
- 21.90
- Economy
- 4.24
- Bowling strike rate
- 30.97
- Away bowling average
- 24.62
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 21.16
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 25.56
- Bowling average in wins
- 17.78
- Volume
- 157 wickets
Australia
- Bowling average
- 20.72
- Economy
- 5.01
- Bowling strike rate
- 24.81
- Away bowling average
- 24.20
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 24.67
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 29.76
- Bowling average in wins
- 16.28
- Volume
- 172 wickets
India
- Bowling average
- 21.88
- Economy
- 4.49
- Bowling strike rate
- 29.21
- Away bowling average
- 14.20
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 29.15
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 20.69
- Bowling average in wins
- 18.95
- Volume
- 103 wickets
Australia
- Bowling average
- 24.60
- Economy
- 4.74
- Bowling strike rate
- 31.17
- Away bowling average
- 24.85
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 25.91
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 25.64
- Bowling average in wins
- 18.00
- Volume
- 126 wickets
Afghanistan
- Bowling average
- 18.55
- Economy
- 4.16
- Bowling strike rate
- 26.75
- Away bowling average
- 16.54
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 47.75
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 31.34
- Bowling average in wins
- 10.53
- Volume
- 133 wickets
South Africa
- Bowling average
- 24.29
- Economy
- 4.95
- Bowling strike rate
- 29.42
- Away bowling average
- 25.34
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 24.49
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 23.08
- Bowling average in wins
- 20.19
- Volume
- 153 wickets
South Africa
- Bowling average
- 24.53
- Economy
- 4.70
- Bowling strike rate
- 31.31
- Away bowling average
- 26.62
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 28.44
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 20.22
- Bowling average in wins
- 22.62
- Volume
- 144 wickets
India
- Bowling average
- 24.80
- Economy
- 4.99
- Bowling strike rate
- 29.82
- Away bowling average
- 19.45
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 24.39
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 33.33
- Bowling average in wins
- 22.01
- Volume
- 99 wickets
Australia
- Bowling average
- 24.05
- Economy
- 4.77
- Bowling strike rate
- 30.27
- Away bowling average
- 34.90
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 25.35
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 28.07
- Bowling average in wins
- 17.78
- Volume
- 94 wickets
South Africa
- Bowling average
- 24.74
- Economy
- 4.66
- Bowling strike rate
- 31.87
- Away bowling average
- 31.33
- Bowling average vs strong opposition
- 40.34
- Wicket-taking consistency
- 20.39
- Bowling average in wins
- 18.79
- Volume
- 172 wickets
- Saeed Ajmal
- 93.8 — led by Volume (23.0 of it), then Bowling average (18.5)
- Mitchell Starc
- 90.1 — led by Volume (23.6 of it), then Bowling average (18.7)
- Jasprit Bumrah
- 88.3 — led by Volume (19.7 of it), then Bowling average (18.6)
- Mitchell Johnson
- 87.7 — led by Volume (21.2 of it), then Bowling average (17.6)
- Rashid Khan
- 87.7 — led by Volume (21.8 of it), then Bowling average (18.9)
- Morne Morkel
- 86.9 — led by Volume (22.7 of it), then Bowling average (17.7)
- Dale Steyn
- 86.4 — led by Volume (22.4 of it), then Bowling average (17.7)
- Kuldeep Yadav
- 83.6 — led by Volume (19.4 of it), then Bowling average (17.4)
- Clint McKay
- 82.8 — led by Volume (18.6 of it), then Bowling average (17.8)
- Imran Tahir
- 82.7 — led by Volume (23.6 of it), then Bowling average (17.5)
Transparent by design
How this ranking was calculated
The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.
- Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
- Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
- Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
- Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
- Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Compared with 228 bowlers who played at least 10 innings and bowled at least 750 balls.
Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.
Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.
Wicket magnitude: career and long-era wicket volume uses 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the leading qualified wicket total. This preserves the difference between exceptional totals that sit together at the top of a percentile table. Run volume stays a pure percentile, because career run totals vary far more widely and blending raw magnitude there would penalise a short career of outstanding quality.
ODI eligibility: this curated list includes players representing current ICC full-member teams. All of their recorded opposition still counts.
Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.