DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

ODI verdict list

Best ODI Bowlers of the 2000s

Muthiah Muralidaran rises above Glenn McGrath by a breath. Glenn McGrath keeps the better bowling average vs strong opposition in ODI bowling, 21.81 to 27.59. Muthiah Muralidaran's volume in ODI bowling settles it, 324 wickets to 233 wickets.

Verdict96.2
Bowling average
20.45
Economy
3.74
Bowling strike rate
32.84
Away bowling average
23.43
Bowling average vs strong opposition
27.59
Wicket-taking consistency
23.83
Bowling average in wins
15.67
Volume
324 wickets
#2

Australia

Verdict95.9
Bowling average
20.21
Economy
3.78
Bowling strike rate
32.10
Away bowling average
22.67
Bowling average vs strong opposition
21.81
Wicket-taking consistency
19.86
Bowling average in wins
17.62
Volume
233 wickets
#3

New Zealand

Verdict91.6
Bowling average
20.88
Economy
4.28
Bowling strike rate
29.25
Away bowling average
22.45
Bowling average vs strong opposition
23.80
Wicket-taking consistency
28.00
Bowling average in wins
16.96
Volume
138 wickets
Verdict89.2
Bowling average
23.23
Economy
4.27
Bowling strike rate
32.63
Away bowling average
26.59
Bowling average vs strong opposition
25.97
Wicket-taking consistency
22.22
Bowling average in wins
18.07
Volume
161 wickets
#5

Australia

Verdict89.1
Bowling average
23.01
Economy
4.72
Bowling strike rate
29.25
Away bowling average
25.75
Bowling average vs strong opposition
23.60
Wicket-taking consistency
25.82
Bowling average in wins
20.70
Volume
324 wickets
#6

South Africa

Verdict87.6
Bowling average
24.60
Economy
4.52
Bowling strike rate
32.64
Away bowling average
25.90
Bowling average vs strong opposition
27.33
Wicket-taking consistency
21.89
Bowling average in wins
19.59
Volume
263 wickets
#7

South Africa

Verdict87.4
Bowling average
24.72
Economy
3.60
Bowling strike rate
41.20
Away bowling average
29.82
Bowling average vs strong opposition
25.93
Wicket-taking consistency
14.35
Bowling average in wins
18.42
Volume
269 wickets
#8
Verdict86.9
Bowling average
17.86
Economy
4.29
Bowling strike rate
24.96
Away bowling average
15.62
Bowling average vs strong opposition
22.43
Wicket-taking consistency
37.84
Bowling average in wins
9.82
Volume
72 wickets
#9
Verdict86.1
Bowling average
24.37
Economy
4.42
Bowling strike rate
33.10
Away bowling average
27.98
Bowling average vs strong opposition
23.31
Wicket-taking consistency
19.83
Bowling average in wins
22.31
Volume
174 wickets
#10
Verdict86.1
Bowling average
24.07
Economy
4.74
Bowling strike rate
30.44
Away bowling average
24.34
Bowling average vs strong opposition
25.42
Wicket-taking consistency
23.21
Bowling average in wins
17.88
Volume
174 wickets
Where the verdict was won
Muthiah Muralidaran
96.2 — led by Volume (25.0 of it), then Bowling average (18.8)
Glenn McGrath
95.9 — led by Volume (23.4 of it), then Bowling average (18.9)
Shane Bond
91.6 — led by Volume (20.6 of it), then Bowling average (18.7)
Andrew Flintoff
89.2 — led by Volume (21.4 of it), then Bowling average (18.1)
Brett Lee
89.1 — led by Volume (25.0 of it), then Bowling average (18.2)
Makhaya Ntini
87.6 — led by Volume (24.0 of it), then Bowling average (17.4)
Shaun Pollock
87.4 — led by Volume (24.2 of it), then Bowling average (17.3)
Ajantha Mendis
86.9 — led by Bowling average (19.0 of it), then Volume (14.8)
Nathan Bracken
86.1 — led by Volume (21.9 of it), then Bowling average (17.5)
Shoaib Akhtar
86.1 — led by Volume (21.9 of it), then Bowling average (17.8)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Bowling factors and weights

Compared with 214 bowlers who played at least 10 innings and bowled at least 750 balls.

Important scoring choices

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.

Wicket magnitude: career and long-era wicket volume uses 85% peer position and 15% raw distance from the leading qualified wicket total. This preserves the difference between exceptional totals that sit together at the top of a percentile table. Run volume stays a pure percentile, because career run totals vary far more widely and blending raw magnitude there would penalise a short career of outstanding quality.

ODI eligibility: this curated list includes players representing current ICC full-member teams. All of their recorded opposition still counts.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
ODIBest ODI Bowlers of the 2000sTop 10