DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

ODI verdict list

Best ODI Batters of the 21st Century

AB de Villiers rises above Virat Kohli by a breath. Virat Kohli keeps the better volume in ODI batting, 14,941 runs to 9,421 runs. AB de Villiers's strike rate in ODI batting settles it, 101.42 to 93.95.

#1

South Africa

Verdict97.8
Average
54.46
Strike rate
101.42
Away average
61.75
Average vs strong opposition
59.79
Consistency
36.32
Average in wins
66.44
Volume
9,421 runs
Verdict97.0
Average
58.59
Strike rate
93.95
Away average
53.96
Average vs strong opposition
57.28
Consistency
44.04
Average in wins
75.32
Volume
14,941 runs
Verdict94.6
Average
48.97
Strike rate
92.83
Away average
41.63
Average vs strong opposition
45.02
Consistency
34.30
Average in wins
58.58
Volume
11,752 runs
#4

South Africa

Verdict94.4
Average
46.86
Strike rate
96.74
Away average
43.78
Average vs strong opposition
44.99
Consistency
34.38
Average in wins
54.35
Volume
7,122 runs
#5

Australia

Verdict93.8
Average
45.31
Strike rate
97.26
Away average
39.18
Average vs strong opposition
46.55
Consistency
34.59
Average in wins
53.91
Volume
6,932 runs
#6

England

Verdict93.5
Average
50.70
Strike rate
87.61
Away average
52.56
Average vs strong opposition
44.09
Consistency
37.22
Average in wins
69.18
Volume
7,706 runs
Verdict93.3
Average
56.09
Strike rate
99.05
Away average
48.50
Average vs strong opposition
41.19
Consistency
42.19
Average in wins
68.97
Volume
3,141 runs
#8

New Zealand

Verdict93.3
Average
57.37
Strike rate
94.49
Away average
59.79
Average vs strong opposition
54.43
Consistency
38.60
Average in wins
70.50
Volume
2,811 runs
#9
Verdict93.2
Average
50.23
Strike rate
87.13
Away average
50.79
Average vs strong opposition
47.20
Consistency
27.89
Average in wins
68.61
Volume
10,599 runs
#10

Pakistan

Verdict93.0
Average
53.44
Strike rate
86.59
Away average
49.56
Average vs strong opposition
48.52
Consistency
41.43
Average in wins
73.19
Volume
6,626 runs
Where the verdict was won
AB de Villiers
97.8 — led by Volume (24.7 of it), then Average (19.9)
Virat Kohli
97.0 — led by Volume (25.0 of it), then Average (20.0)
Rohit Sharma
94.6 — led by Volume (24.9 of it), then Average (19.6)
Quinton de Kock
94.4 — led by Volume (24.1 of it), then Average (19.4)
David Warner
93.8 — led by Volume (24.0 of it), then Average (19.1)
Joe Root
93.5 — led by Volume (24.4 of it), then Average (19.8)
Shubman Gill
93.3 — led by Volume (21.8 of it), then Average (19.9)
Daryl Mitchell
93.3 — led by Volume (21.3 of it), then Average (20.0)
MS Dhoni
93.2 — led by Volume (24.9 of it), then Average (19.7)
Babar Azam
93.0 — led by Volume (23.9 of it), then Average (19.8)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Batting factors and weights

Compared with 829 batters who played at least 10 innings.

Important scoring choices

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.

ODI eligibility: this curated list includes players representing current ICC full-member teams. All of their recorded opposition still counts.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
ODIBest ODI Batters of the 21st CenturyTop 10