DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

ODI verdict list

Best ODI Batters of the 2020s

David Miller rises above Travis Head by a breath. Travis Head keeps the better away average in ODI batting, 63.60 to 47.00. David Miller's average in wins in ODI batting settles it, 72.83 to 62.65.

#1

South Africa

Verdict93.5
Average
53.07
Strike rate
111.93
Away average
47.00
Average vs strong opposition
59.00
Consistency
32.56
Average in wins
72.83
Volume
1,539 runs
#2

Australia

Verdict93.4
Average
52.34
Strike rate
120.50
Away average
63.60
Average vs strong opposition
57.68
Consistency
33.33
Average in wins
62.65
Volume
1,675 runs
Verdict92.0
Average
57.87
Strike rate
99.55
Away average
52.55
Average vs strong opposition
43.48
Consistency
43.55
Average in wins
70.69
Volume
3,125 runs
Verdict91.8
Average
48.41
Strike rate
108.12
Away average
64.17
Average vs strong opposition
47.41
Consistency
38.10
Average in wins
54.26
Volume
2,808 runs
#5
Verdict91.8
Average
57.04
Strike rate
97.81
Away average
57.75
Average vs strong opposition
50.18
Consistency
44.83
Average in wins
88.09
Volume
1,426 runs
#6

New Zealand

Verdict91.6
Average
57.37
Strike rate
94.49
Away average
59.79
Average vs strong opposition
54.43
Consistency
38.60
Average in wins
70.50
Volume
2,811 runs
#7

South Africa

Verdict90.4
Average
49.74
Strike rate
122.89
Away average
37.50
Average vs strong opposition
44.33
Consistency
32.56
Average in wins
62.78
Volume
1,890 runs
#8

South Africa

Verdict90.3
Average
64.18
Strike rate
96.71
Away average
55.60
Average vs strong opposition
76.50
Consistency
58.33
Average in wins
78.75
Volume
706 runs
#9
Verdict90.1
Average
52.74
Strike rate
103.79
Away average
41.91
Average vs strong opposition
44.86
Consistency
34.48
Average in wins
75.60
Volume
1,424 runs
#10
Verdict89.9
Average
54.62
Strike rate
96.36
Away average
34.91
Average vs strong opposition
54.02
Consistency
50.72
Average in wins
68.91
Volume
3,332 runs
Where the verdict was won
David Miller
93.5 — led by Average (19.3 of it), then Strike rate (18.9)
Travis Head
93.4 — led by Strike rate (19.6 of it), then Average (19.0)
Shubman Gill
92.0 — led by Average (19.9 of it), then Strike rate (15.9)
Rohit Sharma
91.8 — led by Average (18.7 of it), then Strike rate (18.4)
Dawid Malan
91.8 — led by Average (19.7 of it), then Strike rate (15.4)
Daryl Mitchell
91.6 — led by Average (19.8 of it), then Strike rate (14.2)
Heinrich Klaasen
90.4 — led by Strike rate (19.7 of it), then Average (18.8)
Matthew Breetzke
90.3 — led by Average (20.0 of it), then Strike rate (15.1)
Sean Williams
90.1 — led by Average (19.2 of it), then Strike rate (17.4)
Virat Kohli
89.9 — led by Average (19.6 of it), then Strike rate (14.8)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Batting factors and weights

Compared with 240 batters who played at least 10 innings.

Important scoring choices

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.

ODI eligibility: this curated list includes players representing current ICC full-member teams. All of their recorded opposition still counts.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
ODIBest ODI Batters of the 2020sTop 10