DeepMidwicket
← All verdict lists

ODI verdict list

Best ODI Batters of the 1990s

Sachin Tendulkar rises above Brian Lara by a breath. Brian Lara keeps the better away average in ODI batting, 41.64 to 33.09. Sachin Tendulkar's strike rate in ODI batting settles it, 86.80 to 79.31.

Verdict96.1
Average
43.07
Strike rate
86.80
Away average
33.09
Average vs strong opposition
40.65
Consistency
30.77
Average in wins
61.77
Volume
8,571 runs
#2

West Indies

Verdict94.8
Average
42.82
Strike rate
79.31
Away average
41.64
Average vs strong opposition
39.14
Consistency
32.08
Average in wins
62.51
Volume
6,166 runs
#3

Australia

Verdict94.2
Average
60.34
Strike rate
76.63
Away average
60.20
Average vs strong opposition
58.42
Consistency
28.04
Average in wins
82.48
Volume
3,922 runs
#4

Pakistan

Verdict93.7
Average
40.63
Strike rate
83.05
Away average
33.40
Average vs strong opposition
35.11
Consistency
28.09
Average in wins
52.48
Volume
6,664 runs
Verdict92.5
Average
37.45
Strike rate
82.78
Away average
35.81
Average vs strong opposition
35.44
Consistency
27.23
Average in wins
52.69
Volume
6,441 runs
Verdict92.3
Average
39.87
Strike rate
76.67
Away average
43.95
Average vs strong opposition
37.59
Consistency
26.32
Average in wins
49.41
Volume
6,858 runs
#7

Australia

Verdict91.5
Average
39.76
Strike rate
77.22
Away average
41.53
Average vs strong opposition
34.07
Consistency
30.48
Average in wins
46.01
Volume
6,839 runs
#8
Verdict91.4
Average
38.74
Strike rate
78.90
Away average
34.30
Average vs strong opposition
37.75
Consistency
23.03
Average in wins
59.41
Volume
5,579 runs
Verdict90.7
Average
42.39
Strike rate
71.40
Away average
41.59
Average vs strong opposition
42.40
Consistency
31.40
Average in wins
59.59
Volume
4,705 runs
#10

South Africa

Verdict90.0
Average
46.43
Strike rate
93.37
Away average
39.29
Average vs strong opposition
45.43
Consistency
21.43
Average in wins
43.29
Volume
1,718 runs
Where the verdict was won
Sachin Tendulkar
96.1 — led by Volume (25.0 of it), then Average (19.7)
Brian Lara
94.8 — led by Volume (24.5 of it), then Average (19.6)
Michael Bevan
94.2 — led by Volume (23.5 of it), then Average (20.0)
Saeed Anwar
93.7 — led by Volume (24.7 of it), then Average (19.4)
Aravinda de Silva
92.5 — led by Volume (24.6 of it), then Average (18.1)
Mohammad Azharuddin
92.3 — led by Volume (24.9 of it), then Average (18.9)
Mark Waugh
91.5 — led by Volume (24.8 of it), then Average (18.8)
Arjuna Ranatunga
91.4 — led by Volume (24.4 of it), then Average (18.4)
Sourav Ganguly
90.7 — led by Volume (24.0 of it), then Average (19.5)
Lance Klusener
90.0 — led by Average (19.9 of it), then Volume (19.5)
Each bar is that player’s score out of 100, split into what produced it: segment length is the facet’s peer score times its weight. Darkest segment first. The segments add up to the score, so the bars are read against each other, not against a grid.

Transparent by design

How this ranking was calculated

The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.

From scorecards to a verdict score
  1. Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
  2. Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
  3. Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
  4. Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
  5. Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Batting factors and weights

Compared with 295 batters who played at least 10 innings.

Important scoring choices

Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.

Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.

ODI eligibility: this curated list includes players representing current ICC full-member teams. All of their recorded opposition still counts.

Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.

Data and query audit
ODIBest ODI Batters of the 1990sTop 10