ODI verdict list
Best ODI All-rounders of the 2020s
Shakib Al Hasan rises above David Willey by a breath. David Willey keeps the better strike rate in ODI batting, 108.47 to 83.30. Shakib Al Hasan's economy in ODI bowling settles it, 4.38 to 5.18.
Bangladesh
- ODI Batting
- 66.3
- ODI Bowling
- 76.9
England
- ODI Batting
- 60.9
- ODI Bowling
- 79.9
India
- ODI Batting
- 75.4
- ODI Bowling
- 61.4
England
- ODI Batting
- 54.9
- ODI Bowling
- 80.6
Ireland
- ODI Batting
- 55.8
- ODI Bowling
- 71.5
Sri Lanka
- ODI Batting
- 52.2
- ODI Bowling
- 74.7
Afghanistan
- ODI Batting
- 45.6
- ODI Bowling
- 80.4
Pakistan
- ODI Batting
- 45.6
- ODI Bowling
- 75.2
Sri Lanka
- ODI Batting
- 72.1
- ODI Bowling
- 46.3
Ireland
- ODI Batting
- 40.5
- ODI Bowling
- 73.3
- Shakib Al Hasan
- 66.3 — led by Average (13.7 of it), then Average vs strong opposition (11.5)
- David Willey
- 60.9 — led by Strike rate (18.5 of it), then Average (12.3)
- Hardik Pandya
- 75.4 — led by Strike rate (17.8 of it), then Average (14.4)
- Jofra Archer
- 54.9 — led by Strike rate (22.8 of it), then Average (12.0). 15% of the weight had no figure to score and was spread across the rest.
- Simi Singh
- 55.8 — led by Average vs strong opposition (14.8 of it), then Average (13.6). 15% of the weight had no figure to score and was spread across the rest.
- Wanindu Hasaranga
- 52.2 — led by Strike rate (18.8 of it), then Average (8.8)
- Rashid Khan
- 45.6 — led by Strike rate (19.5 of it), then Average (6.5)
- Naseem Shah
- 45.6 — led by Strike rate (11.5 of it), then Average in wins (9.5)
- Charith Asalanka
- 72.1 — led by Average (16.1 of it), then Average in wins (12.5)
- Craig Young
- 40.5 — led by Strike rate (15.8 of it), then Average vs strong opposition (10.5). 15% of the weight had no figure to score and was spread across the rest.
- Shakib Al Hasan
- 76.9 — led by Economy (19.5 of it), then Bowling average (16.5)
- David Willey
- 79.9 — led by Bowling average (19.3 of it), then Economy (12.4)
- Hardik Pandya
- 61.4 — led by Bowling average (14.5 of it), then Bowling average vs strong opposition (13.2)
- Jofra Archer
- 80.6 — led by Bowling average (17.6 of it), then Bowling average vs strong opposition (13.7)
- Simi Singh
- 71.5 — led by Economy (20.0 of it), then Bowling average (18.7)
- Wanindu Hasaranga
- 74.7 — led by Bowling average (18.5 of it), then Economy (15.8)
- Rashid Khan
- 80.4 — led by Economy (19.3 of it), then Bowling average (17.5)
- Naseem Shah
- 75.2 — led by Bowling average (16.9 of it), then Bowling average vs strong opposition (11.6)
- Charith Asalanka
- 46.3 — led by Bowling average vs strong opposition (15.0 of it), then Economy (14.7)
- Craig Young
- 73.3 — led by Bowling average (15.1 of it), then Bowling average vs strong opposition (11.7)
Transparent by design
How this ranking was calculated
The list is computed from scorecards, not selected by an AI model. Every player is measured against the same qualified peer population, and the rules below determine the order.
- Build the eligible peer population using the selected format, time window and qualification bars.
- Calculate every batting or bowling factor directly from the matching scorecards.
- Convert each factor to a score against qualified peers, respecting whether higher or lower is better.
- Apply the published weights. If a factor is unavailable, its weight is redistributed across that player's recorded factors.
- Add the weighted factors to produce the verdict score out of 100, then rank from highest to lowest.
Compared with 240 batters who played at least 10 innings.
Compared with 111 bowlers who played at least 10 innings and bowled at least 750 balls.
Contribution: total runs or wickets measure output within the selected period.
Fixed-era weighting: longevity is not scored because a player should not be penalised when only part of their career overlaps the era. Its allocation moves to runs or wickets.
All-rounders: a player must clear both qualification bars. The batting and bowling verdicts are combined with a geometric mean, preventing one outstanding discipline from completely carrying a weak one.
ODI eligibility: this curated list includes players representing current ICC full-member teams. All of their recorded opposition still counts.
Editorial scope: this is a transparent judgement model, not an official record table. It does not insert or promote named players, and it applies no blanket era multiplier.